Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '20 at 19:31
Run Duration	430 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 88 2-Core 172 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 491 50% 402 Pts	64-Core 517 32% 517 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 460 181 User benchmarks, average bench 21% XFX(1682 946D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1328 MHz, MLim: 1661 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.3 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Lighting 28.2 Reflection 33.5 Parallax 35.4 23% 32.4 fps	MRender 31 Gravity 28.2 Splatting 34.3 26% 31.2 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190 33,949 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 384 379 376 379 379 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 1166 Write 941 Mixed 812 SusWrite 380 184% 825 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 46 4K Mixed 2.7 97% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 20.9 DQ Mixed 19.3 15% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 282%
Jmicron Tech 240GB 278 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 187GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 325 320 320 319 322 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Read 316 Write 333 Mixed 261 SusWrite 321 70% 308 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 31.6 104% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 142 DQ Mixed 147 110% 147 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 71%
Adata SU655 240GB 2,317 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 104GB free Firmware: V8X02c08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 318 305 298 304 307 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 1,926 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0342 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 158 166 168 167 163 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 136 Write 38 Mixed 74 SusWrite 162 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 0.9 8% 3.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1.3 DQ Write 7.4 DQ Mixed 2.1 2% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 18%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 241 226 249 230 231 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Write 2.2 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 231 74% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.2 568% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 1.5TB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 272 307 299 305 306 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124 3,178 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: MEAOA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 108 108 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 120 Write 121 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 108 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 66%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 398GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 122 124 123 123 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 136 Write 71.5 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 117 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 84%
ST2000LM 015-2E8174 2TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 811GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 100 95 98 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 49 Write 68 Mixed 51.2 SusWrite 97.1 95% 66.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.4 131% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR3 2133 2OZ DDR3 2133 2OZ 1866 CL10 Series 1866 CL10 Series 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.8% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 19.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 15.6 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	431x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	85x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16