ECS GeForce 8000 series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardECS GeForce 8000 series  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 03:05
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom X3 8650
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 33.3
2-Core 67.7
40% 58.3 Pts
4-Core 98.5
8-Core 100
13% 99.4 Pts
64-Core 99.7
6% 99.7 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 21.1
17% 19.4 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 16.2
16% 20.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 240GB-$58
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 176 132 52 73 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.5% Above average
Read 236
Write 198
Mixed 183
SusWrite 129
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 30.7
100% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 151
115% 155 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
297GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 119 119 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 126
Write 117
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 118
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 2G-UDIMM 2G-UDIMM 2G-UDIMM 8GB
333, 200, 333, 200 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 8
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.2
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GeForce 8000 series Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS GeForce 8000 series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback