Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '17 at 18:09
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$232
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 144
2-Core 276
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 787
78% 638 Pts
64-Core 779
48% 779 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Nvidia(10DE 11A9) 2GB
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25% Poor
Lighting 30.2
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 28.2
25% 29.9 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 29.5
26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ256GCSY 256GB
192GB free
Firmware: JYRA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 474
Mixed 498
110% 493 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 45.7
158% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 205
186% 281 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 112%
Great: 105%
Toshiba THNSNJ128GCSY 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYRA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 456
Mixed 494
108% 485 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 41.2
150% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 177
160% 240 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 106%
Great: 104%
Toshiba THNSN9240GESG 240GB
78GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 499
Mixed 512
114% 508 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 14.3
119% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 67.4
128% 254 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
2.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 143
Write 112
Mixed 131
97% 128 MB/s
4K Read 4.28
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.34
258% 2.29 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W4U2400PS-8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 20.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 22.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $742
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback