Asrock 970 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 13:02
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 107
52% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 254
28% 223 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84E1) 2GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.1
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 20.8
19% 20.6 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 17.7
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 263 240 210 162 259 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 440
Write 370
Mixed 180
SusWrite 233
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 24.3
100% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 48
81% 156 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 92%
WD 820AS External 320GB
77GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 25 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.2% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 13.2
Mixed 20
SusWrite 25.5
28% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.8% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 15.8
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback