HP ENVY TE01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ENVY TE01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8653
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime21.9 Days
Run DateNov 07 '20 at 03:45
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$155
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 751
78% 628 Pts
64-Core 748
46% 748 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
HP(103C 8558) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.7% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 51.9
Parallax 46.3
46% 51.6 fps
MRender 44.7
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 48
39% 47.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 185 192 190 189 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 700
Write 227
Mixed 329
SusWrite 190
80% 362 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 39.1
162% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 496
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 269
222% 325 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 104%
Great: 164%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
613GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 171 168 174 175 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 155
Mixed 90
SusWrite 172
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
WD 820AS External 320GB
298GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 40 41 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.7% Very poor
Read 35
Write 20.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 40.9
42% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 19%
DISK SCSI_DISK_1234 2GB
2GB free, PID 8902
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.2 3.1 1.8 3.3 3.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Read 12.3
Write 1.5
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 2.9
5% 5.05 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
46.8% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY TE01-0xxx Builds (Compare 432 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY TE01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback