Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive12.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 23:16
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 127
52% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 267
27% 220 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 22 21 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.7% Very poor
Read 39.1
Write 39.5
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 21.4
8% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 3.2
33% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.5
DQ Write 15.2
DQ Mixed 0.8
5% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 78%
Virtual HD 34GB
29GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 34.6
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 17
7% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 13
45% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 14.6
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 17%
Great: 73%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 4.5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 1.7 9 13 4.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.22% Terrible
Read 15.7
Write 27.7
Mixed 19
SusWrite 8.8
13% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.22%
Great: 57%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 7.6 1.4 6.6 9.3 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Read 14
Write 24.3
Mixed 18.4
SusWrite 6.1
12% 15.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
1024, 15360 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 18.6
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.9
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback