Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateOct 30 '20 at 12:03
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.9% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 201
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 328
31% 255 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
6.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.17
Reflection 9.73
Parallax 6.69
5% 7.53 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 13.4
8% 9.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.17%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 26 29 22 23 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
100GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 51 52 48 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 90
Write 85.5
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 50.7
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 109%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 4.5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 47 44 47 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 154
Write 123
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 43.3
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-137.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.3% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 20.7
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 19.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback