Today's hottest deals

Asus Z97-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-K  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '15 at 15:13
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4330-$140
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 102
2-Core 186
66% 144 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 269
37% 273 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 49% Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7870-GHz
MSI(1462 2740) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1023.5
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 46.1
29% 38.4 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 33
Splatting 39.3
28% 33.7 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
102GB free
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 459
Write 335
Mixed 309
81% 367 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 21.7
124% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 45.3
90% 184 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 93%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 411
Mixed 416
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 25.5
150% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 45.9
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 24.6
53% 102 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 115%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
54GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 83.4
Write 87.9
Mixed 73.1
105% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.17
61% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 45%
Integral Neon USB 3.0 16GB-$14
8GB free, PID 9917
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 115
Write 8.18
Mixed 15.6
38% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.02
55% 4.84 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 33%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050H 500GB
3GB free, PID 3200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 79.2
Mixed 99.6
135% 118 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 4.8
1,024% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 11.7
DQ Write 21.6
DQ Mixed 4.82
941% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 119%
Great: 120%
Typical Z97-K Builds (Compare 3,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-K - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback