Gigabyte GA-H61M-D2-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive1.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-D2-B3  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 07:42
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 187
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 380
50% 378 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 14.8
9% 12.1 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 35.5
Splatting 11.6
21% 27.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.5 7.9 9 11 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Read 8.1
Write 13.5
Mixed 11.4
SusWrite 9
2% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
1% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 21%
52netbar iShareDisk 8TB
295GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 9.7 11 10 12 9.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.2% Poor
Read 61
Write 58.5
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 10.8
39% 51.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.4
283% 2.47 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-D2-B3 Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-D2-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback