Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '18 at 20:12
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 726
74% 597 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 115
Parallax 94.3
86% 105 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 97.6
Splatting 102
82% 99.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
52netbar iShareDisk 120GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 67.1
Write 77.1
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 36.1
14% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 15.1
51% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 15
11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
52netbar iShareDisk 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 31%
52netbar iShareDisk 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FD2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 30.3
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 830 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback