Asus H81M-CS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H81M-CS  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '20 at 12:43
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 166
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 276
34% 258 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.19
4% 4.31 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 141 194 84 94 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47% Average
Read 128
Write 238
Mixed 197
SusWrite 132
40% 174 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 21.8
78% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 122
117% 188 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
423GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 101 95 91 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 111
Write 84.8
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 96.8
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EBO-CKO ZION8GBDDR3PC1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.7% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-CS Builds (Compare 574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $68
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback