QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	98.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	21.1 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '20 at 19:49
Run Duration	257 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC (with IBPB) 535 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Memory 69.1 1-Core 146 2-Core 294 90% 170 Pts	4-Core 581 8-Core 1,131 101% 856 Pts	64-Core 2680 166% 2680 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.4% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 0.12 Parallax 0.03 100% 41.1 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 129 Splatting 107 95% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 960GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 252GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 315 321 321 321 231 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 459 Write 327 Mixed 313 SusWrite 303 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 17.5 69% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 76.1 84% 140 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 99 120 140 116 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 93%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 230GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 147 147 127 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 157 Write 110 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 141 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 451GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 15 16 16 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 721GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 128 155 161 154 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.6% Very good	Read 113 Write 153 Mixed 111 SusWrite 150 98% 132 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 227% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 28GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 12288 MB Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 27.5 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 26.9 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	21x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	30x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	141x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406