QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory20.8 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 08 '20 at 00:44
Run Duration300 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 67
1-Core 154
2-Core 296
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 1,147
103% 868 Pts
64-Core 2,691
166% 2,691 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.4% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 0.12
Parallax 0.09
98% 40.1 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 123
Splatting 103
91% 112 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 960GB
178GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 265 138 6.5 6.4 6.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 462
Write 321
Mixed 324
SusWrite 115
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 14.4
60% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 79.4
86% 143 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,111
Write 559
Mixed 1686
1,342% 1,785 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 0
3,416% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 429
3,196% 263 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 93%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
262GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 135 145 147 147 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 172
Write 165
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 142
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
462GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 579 596 653 733 766 763 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 111%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
621GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 18 14 16 18 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.2% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 84
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 16.3
26% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0
55% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.2%
Great: 76%
Red Hat VirtIO 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 18 15 16 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.9% Below average
Read 99.7
Write 136
Mixed 109
SusWrite 16.1
68% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.2
276% 2.67 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 28GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 12288 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 27.8
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 26.4
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback