Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190902
Uptime	12.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '20 at 03:14
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 71 1-Core 105 2-Core 210 71% 129 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 510 56% 445 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% EVGA(3842 3172) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.5% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 102 Parallax 112 86% 106 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 101 Splatting 84.7 85% 107 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBA3V2500ANC-WRSN 250GB 292 User benchmarks, average bench 171% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 205 164 161 163 157 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 1,066 Write 784 Mixed 785 SusWrite 195 158% 708 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 75.4 4K Mixed 35.9 125% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 611 DQ Write 473 DQ Mixed 527 398% 537 MB/s
Poor: 117% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 199%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 493GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 303 349 356 363 371 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 361 Write 345 Mixed 330 SusWrite 338 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 56.6 4K Mixed 32.9 109% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 351 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 167 160 155 159 166 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Read 143 Write 150 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 162 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 55% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 4x8GB 2,651 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 15.4 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 10.4 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 99 40% 99 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 115%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 150%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 139%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $365Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,535x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,340x
RTX 2080Nvidia $270Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	1,147x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,378x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	1,064x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	821x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $108Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	754x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $105Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	600x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	534x

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,164