Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory11.7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 11.7GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory5.6 GB free of 11.7188 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '20 at 10:20
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 224
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 646
66% 531 Pts
64-Core 898
56% 898 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.2
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.3% Excellent
Lighting 96.2
Reflection 97.2
Parallax 203
78% 132 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 129
Splatting 154
110% 132 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 120GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 61 18 48 39 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 393
Write 332
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 81.6
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 0.9
21% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 67%
Qemu HARDDISK 351GB
13GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 73 79 77 76 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
Read 45.4
Write 74.2
Mixed 48
SusWrite 74
45% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.13 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x11GB
1 of 1 slots used
11GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 25.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 21.8
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback