Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 12 '20 at 21:16
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 219
77% 138 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 654
57% 486 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 50
Parallax 43.6
38% 47 fps
MRender 46.4
Gravity 75.7
Splatting 50.5
47% 57.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 308 301 304 305 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 349
Write 306
Mixed 277
SusWrite 303
70% 309 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 26.3
92% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 230
202% 303 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
558GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 142 142 142 142 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 168
Write 126
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 141
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
95GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 152 154 156 155 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 153
Write 164
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 155
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GE2666C16K8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.1% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 20.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 8.7
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $628
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback