HP Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory6.3 GB free of 10.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '20 at 21:09
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3520-$230
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 130
58% 93 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 338
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 4.69
3% 4.45 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 5.78
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell VIRTUAL DISK 319GB
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1028
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 27 19 17 37 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 44.2
Write 77.4
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 32
34% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT325U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 44GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.8% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Workstation Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback