Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateOct 25 '20 at 00:30
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 62.5
2-Core 112
53% 84.3 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 272
29% 232 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 99.8
Reflection 117
Parallax 107
81% 108 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 86.2
83% 103 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 24 161 388 24 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 356
Write 337
Mixed 340
SusWrite 119
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 30.8
109% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 175
144% 204 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
338GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 171 172 171 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 147
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 168
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 103%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
755GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 57 57 58 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 52.5
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 56.6
38% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 CML8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.6% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 10
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.6
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback