Asus G20CI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus G20CI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20CI
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 08 '20 at 23:46
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 226
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 675
69% 556 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U512G1002 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 215 233 254 199 240 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 484
Write 425
Mixed 245
SusWrite 237
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 34.8
120% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 205
178% 266 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 97%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$198
105GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 160 160 160 159 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 486
Mixed 397
SusWrite 210
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 48
172% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 103%
Great: 122%
Seagate ST2000DM001-1ER164 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 137 139 137 145 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 101
Write 118
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 141
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC M471A2K43BB1-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 25.9
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 26.5
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20CI Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Asus G20CI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $445
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback