Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive280% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 01:49
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 223
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 650
64% 526 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.9% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 109
Parallax 119
96% 115 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 105
Splatting 77
83% 105 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
316GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1916 971 834 836 837 826 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
280% Outstanding
Read 2,486
Write 2266
Mixed 1,823
SusWrite 1,037
426% 1,903 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 78.3
250% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,029
DQ Write 732
DQ Mixed 942
687% 901 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 280%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
660GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1592 1545 1562 1488 1494 1484 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,376
Write 1,597
Mixed 1,650
SusWrite 1,528
400% 1,788 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 74.5
241% 80.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,072
DQ Write 966
DQ Mixed 1,040
774% 1,026 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 309%
Great: 410%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU000J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 141 141 141 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 126
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 140
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
208% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 79%
Hitachi HTS541010B9E380 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 116 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 114
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE BL16G32C16U4BL.M8FB1 BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE BL16G32C16U4BL.M8FB1 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 27.4
85% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 25.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback