PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7522 |
Motherboard | MSI X58 Pro-E (MS-7522) (all builds) |
Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110319 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | Nov 16 '20 at 03:05 |
Run Duration | 221 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2680) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 19 36 46 35 6.6 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 108 107 108 107 MB/s
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD1600AAJB-00PVA0 160GB
46GB free
Firmware: 100.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
7.96%
Terrible
|
|||
18.9%
Very poor
|
||||
Innostor Innostor 16GB
15GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
7.95%
Terrible
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.8 4.9 6.6 5.5 7.2 MB/s
|
4.44%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 4GB
3GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.4 5.4 5.3 5.5 5.4 MB/s
|
4.56%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 500GB
465GB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 103 102 104 102 MB/s
|
44.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 6 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
33%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 188x |
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 124x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 87x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 65x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 63x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 56x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $244 |