Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 7% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium M processor 2.00GHz 9 User benchmarks, average bench 31% uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 62.5 1-Core 12.7 2-Core 18.4 26% 31.2 Pts	4-Core 18.5 8-Core 16.1 2% 17.3 Pts	64-Core 18.9 1% 18.9 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 6600 20 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Toshiba(1179 0001) Driver: Ver. 7.8.9.2 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.25% Terrible	Lighting 0.47 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.36 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.25% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba RAID LD1 80GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 72GB free Firmware: Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.7% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 31.9 Mixed 32.4 24% 32.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.23 4K Mixed 0.29 70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 19%
Toshiba RAID LD0 80GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 27 Mixed 17.4 18% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.01 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.04 6% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x0.5GB 3,675 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2 of 2 slots used 1GB SODIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.2 6% 2.2 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 0.1 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8% Great: 15%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM