Biostar N61PB-M2S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 6%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardBiostar N61PB-M2S  (all builds)
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090903
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 09:21
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 8600B Triple-Core
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 28.1
1-Core 34
2-Core 67.9
25% 43.3 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 100
14% 100 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 23%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1642 3F86) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.13% Terrible
Lighting 8.93
Reflection 7.81
Parallax 9.31
7% 8.68 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.37
Splatting 7.26
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 15 15 32 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.93% Terrible
Read 10
Write 90.7
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 17
24% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 59%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
49GB free
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 98 131 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 182
Write 182
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 111
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 103%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
17GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 73 69 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41% Average
Read 69.7
Write 45.5
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 72.8
44% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 0
SC Mixed 0
0% 0 GB/s
Latency 266
15% 266 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N61PB-M2S Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar N61PB-M2S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback