Lenovo 6209CY1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 6209CY1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 07:45
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 77.5
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 90.7
46% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 89.9
8-Core 90.1
12% 90 Pts
64-Core 89.3
6% 89.3 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
Legend(17AA 3047) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.45% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.8
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.1
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.45%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3700100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 235 235 199 178 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62% Good
Read 259
Write 235
Mixed 237
SusWrite 220
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 26.3
103% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 110
94% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62%
Great: 100%
Fujitsu MHW2060BH 60GB
55GB free
Firmware: 00850012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 38 37 34 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 39.2
Write 38
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 37.8
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x1GB
3 of 4 slots used
3GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 6209CY1 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 6209CY1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback