Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110 18,841 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.15 GHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 45.6 2-Core 90.7 46% 71.3 Pts	4-Core 89.9 8-Core 90.1 12% 90 Pts	64-Core 89.3 6% 89.3 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset 16,152 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 3047) 1.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.45% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 0.8 0% 0.67 fps	MRender 0.4 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 1.1 0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.45% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3700100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 235 235 199 178 237 MB/s Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62% Good	Read 259 Write 235 Mixed 237 SusWrite 220 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 26.3 103% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 110 94% 138 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 100%
Fujitsu MHW2060BH 60GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 55GB free Firmware: 00850012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 38 37 34 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 39.2 Write 38 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 37.8 26% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x1GB 7,767 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 3 of 4 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	22.3% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.2 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $110