Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B360M AORUS Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '20 at 16:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 254
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 491
67% 496 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.6% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 95.5
57% 78.1 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 52.8
52% 65.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS0328D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 277 262 265 265 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,524
Write 539
Mixed 121
SusWrite 272
185% 864 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 78.7
266% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 388
333% 505 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 225%
Great: 277%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 26.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 24
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360M AORUS Gaming 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback