QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14.9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14.9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.9 GB free of 14.9004 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 04:57
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC (with IBPB)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 890
78% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,332
82% 1,332 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
XFX(1682 9C30) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.3% Very good
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 108
Parallax 150
81% 119 fps
MRender 90.5
Gravity 108
Splatting 75.7
73% 91.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 60GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 45 113 63 117 48 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
Read 318
Write 108
Mixed 131
SusWrite 79.4
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 8.3
49% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 68.2
DQ Write 85.4
DQ Mixed 47.1
44% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Red Hat VirtIO 1TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 512 613 618 623 627 622 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 24.9
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 22.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback