QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory14.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.7 GB free of 14.6484 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '22 at 10:04
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Six-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 183
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 608
55% 462 Pts
64-Core 670
42% 670 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
Gigabyte(1458 3FC9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 92.8
Parallax 99
82% 97.6 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 94.6
Splatting 85.4
81% 101 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 60GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 81 75 89 78 72 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.2% Below average
Read 393
Write 144
Mixed 148
SusWrite 77.3
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 9.9
41% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 73.9
DQ Write 72.6
DQ Mixed 9.9
25% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Qemu HARDDISK 120GB
2GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 132
Write 61.2
Mixed 9.8
15% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 3.1
13% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x14GB
1 of 1 slots used
14GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 33
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 28.8
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 20.9
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback