Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	17.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '21 at 04:48
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 75.1 1-Core 147 2-Core 293 92% 172 Pts	4-Core 555 8-Core 905 89% 730 Pts	64-Core 1,382 86% 1,382 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Gigabyte(1458 2311) CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.5% Above average	Lighting 70.3 Reflection 68.5 Parallax 96 57% 78.3 fps	MRender 67.5 Gravity 74.4 Splatting 52.8 52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,655 Write 2,076 Mixed 1924 493% 2,218 MB/s	4K Read 69 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 94.6 317% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,292 DQ Write 1,094 DQ Mixed 1,155 876% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 327GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1642 1089 779 793 787 798 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	310% Outstanding	Read 2,488 Write 1,639 Mixed 1,625 SusWrite 982 375% 1,683 MB/s	4K Read 67.1 4K Write 159 4K Mixed 87.5 298% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,397 DQ Write 1,239 DQ Mixed 1294 977% 1,310 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 310% Great: 355%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KD4AGU880-32A160T 2x16GB 314 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.4% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 30.6 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 29.2 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,139x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,716x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $144Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	913x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	881x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	698x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	276x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $1,176

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16