Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 06:59
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 135
2-Core 281
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 882
83% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
PwrHis(1787 2020) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 88
58% 76.6 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 43.1
44% 55.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Singe 480GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0616B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.1 1.3 1.6 222 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 482
Write 366
Mixed 365
SusWrite 63.3
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 114%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
289GB free
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 489 489 489 394 283 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 428
Mixed 439
SusWrite 439
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 59.8
200% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 126%
Great: 126%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 57 57 54 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 60.6
Write 53.4
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 56.4
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 63%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$149
3TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 178 185 178 185 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
963GB free
Firmware: 20.04F20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 69 70 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 86.9
Write 81.4
Mixed 56
SusWrite 68.7
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 22.8
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 25
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $650
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback