Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 85 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 164 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 152 31% 212 Pts	64-Core 281 17% 281 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 0495) 1GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 25.5 Parallax 30 18% 26.1 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 23.1 19% 22.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 22%
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 844D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.36% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.13 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.9 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.36% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 200 200 159 156 151 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.8% Above average	Read 218 Write 207 Mixed 191 SusWrite 176 45% 198 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 31.8 102% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 33.5 DQ Write 75.2 DQ Mixed 44.8 37% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion Desk 750GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 499GB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 27.2 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 15.6 19% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 44%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 309GB free Firmware: 0712 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 32 Write 28 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 15.8 18% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5458-036.A00LF 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	47.1% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 16.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	43x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	26x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	18x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $198

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16