Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-DS3H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 02:39
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 153
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 244
33% 247 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 7.2
4% 6.97 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 10.3
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS1 20G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 18 9.8 24 8.6 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 456
Write 288
Mixed 182
SusWrite 54.6
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 72.3
DQ Mixed 30.4
40% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 54%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
293GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 92 94 96 96 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 101
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 90.5
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 28.2
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback