Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200617
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '21 at 07:57
Run Duration	409 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140 16,466 User benchmarks, average bench 81% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	80.3% Excellent	Memory 67.3 1-Core 140 2-Core 275 85% 161 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 600 73% 562 Pts	64-Core 649 40% 649 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 2583) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Lighting 56.8 Reflection 60 Parallax 58.7 46% 58.5 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 52.7 Splatting 47.6 44% 54.6 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CSSD-MG4VT 500GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: SCFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 424 432 395 337 345 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 442 Mixed 354 SusWrite 388 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 86.2 4K Mixed 30 129% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 153 130% 190 MB/s
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 133%
CSSD-M2B5GPG3VNF 500GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 288% 208GB free Firmware: EGFM11.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1097 468 441 462 456 449 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 1,988 Write 2,401 Mixed 1,798 SusWrite 562 379% 1,687 MB/s	4K Read 51 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 63.3 225% 80.1 MB/s	DQ Read 899 DQ Write 676 DQ Mixed 823 606% 799 MB/s
Poor: 181% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 378%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 549GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 1385 1442 1441 1464 1460 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 1,479 Write 1,457 Mixed 1,094 SusWrite 1,412 306% 1,361 MB/s	4K Read 56 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 74.6 260% 93.8 MB/s	DQ Read 685 DQ Write 724 DQ Mixed 272 324% 560 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 295%
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GB 6,074 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 82GB free Firmware: STRSD013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 407 409 348 334 351 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 443 Mixed 447 SusWrite 382 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 40.3 4K Write 88.6 4K Mixed 53.6 177% 60.8 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 205 154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 136%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 707GB free Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3007 3019 3026 2805 1571 1568 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	383% Outstanding	Read 2,691 Write 2920 Mixed 2,760 SusWrite 2,499 614% 2,718 MB/s	4K Read 65.4 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 85.8 278% 93.9 MB/s	DQ Read 870 DQ Write 728 DQ Mixed 799 598% 799 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 383% Great: 488%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 148 147 147 147 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 148 Write 123 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 147 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 84%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 931GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 136 135 135 139 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 119 Write 121 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 133 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 2.3 450% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 264 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.5% Good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 25.1 64% 22.5 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 22.3 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 137%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	506x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	488x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	362x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	242x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	189x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	162x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	112x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	100x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	74x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	73x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $697

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16