Biostar A320MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A320MH  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200715
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '21 at 14:04
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 200GE Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 98.1
45% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 141
8-Core 165
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Biostar(1565 170B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.20
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 6.4
3% 5.2 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 7.9
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aitc KSM SSD 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2012XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 293 252 49 209 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 338
Write 279
Mixed 243
SusWrite 179
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 17.6
61% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 74.9
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 98.8
85% 121 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
237GB free
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 109 110 97 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 86.3
Write 93.8
Mixed 44.4
SusWrite 104
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-8GB-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 5.1
18% 6.2 GB/s
Latency 163
25% 163 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320MH Builds (Compare 1,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $323
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback