Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 02:26
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 86.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 736
74% 602 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11 Pro 512GB
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B1T3NA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 837 553 556 558 564 555 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 2,359
Write 1,882
Mixed 1,582
SusWrite 604
358% 1,607 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 76.6
254% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 971
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 601
522% 777 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 249%
Great: 318%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
619GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 147 143 137 148 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 80.7
Write 87.7
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 144
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 106%
Seagate Desktop HDD 1TB (2013)
399GB free
Firmware: CC92
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 66 65 67 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 57.3
Write 62.4
Mixed 50
SusWrite 65.7
44% 58.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 44.8
MC Mixed 39.8
124% 43.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 34
100% 35.1 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 119%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback