To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191025
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 01 '21 at 11:06
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 3,274 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	49.8% Average	Memory 78.8 1-Core 44.8 2-Core 96 47% 73.2 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 107 16% 117 Pts	64-Core 144 9% 144 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XFX(1682 9470) CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.1 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.7% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 57.6 Parallax 62.1 32% 53.1 fps	MRender 58.4 Gravity 47.3 Splatting 41.9 39% 49.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1120A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 173 22 5.3 16 17 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.8% Below average	Read 248 Write 209 Mixed 222 SusWrite 39.8 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 18.4 74% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 76 DQ Write 7.3 DQ Mixed 0.2 11% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 81%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB 5,568 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 235GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.9 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 118 Write 0.3 Mixed 46 SusWrite 2 31% 41.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 2x8GB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,574 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	712x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	278x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	264x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	616x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	300x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16