Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	24.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '21 at 17:18
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 74.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 231 77% 141 Pts	4-Core 397 8-Core 678 65% 537 Pts	64-Core 932 58% 932 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 16.9 Reflection 27.7 Parallax 21.8 14% 22.1 fps	MRender 25 Gravity 16 Splatting 20 16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 856 584 573 575 571 576 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	210% Outstanding	Read 2,371 Write 2,091 Mixed 1,550 SusWrite 622 370% 1,659 MB/s	4K Read 48.8 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 57.7 189% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 487 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 435 317% 416 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 210% Great: 340%
Hitachi HDS721680PLA380 82GB-$41 865 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 9GB free Firmware: P21OA70A SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 52 51 51 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 52.4 Write 50.7 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 52 35% 47.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 40%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 507GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 58 58 58 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 89.1 Write 102 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 57.7 56% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 58%
Samsung HD252KJ 250GB 1,184 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 32GB free Firmware: CM100-06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 17.5 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 16.8 15% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 42%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 428 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 15GB free, PID 0732 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 32 31 32 31 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 30.6 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 31.3 42% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3.5 206% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.9% Very good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 26.6 MC Mixed 25.6 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 28.2 SC Mixed 23.3 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 91.1 44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)