Asus P7H57D-V EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H57D-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120928
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '21 at 10:00
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 95.4 1-Core 89.3 2-Core 158 70% 114 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 404 43% 344 Pts	64-Core 405 25% 405 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Asus(1043 8390) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 20.6 Reflection 28.5 Parallax 19.5 17% 22.9 fps	MRender 29.4 Gravity 22.5 Splatting 19.9 19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 120GB-$75 5,451 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: RG21 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 163 152 151 156 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.5% Above average	Read 224 Write 191 Mixed 185 SusWrite 156 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 49.6 4K Mixed 25.3 90% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 128 111% 165 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 87%
Seagate ST4000NM0045-1VT107 4TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 3.5TB free Firmware: TS04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 209 207 208 210 208 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 193 Mixed 80.4 SusWrite 208 124% 171 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 1.2 268% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 118%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 16GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 16 16 16 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	8.24% Terrible	Read 26.2 Write 15 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 15.6 19% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.24% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 13.6 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 13.4 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 55.8 72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H57D-V EVO Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H57D-V EVO

CPU
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	37x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	32x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	30x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	7x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	8x
BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GBSeagateBench 117%, 6,074 samples	8x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	49x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	42x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $310

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16