Today's hottest deals

MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '21 at 09:45
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 148
2-Core 291
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 888
89% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 99.2
Parallax 84.7
56% 84.3 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 74
Splatting 48.8
50% 63 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KDA4101 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 244 216 227 251 248 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,032
Write 392
Mixed 345
SusWrite 243
110% 503 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 31.8
176% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 352
311% 479 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 132%
Great: 141%
Galax TA1D0240A 240GB
118GB free
Firmware: SBFM11.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 94 95 95 96 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 493
Write 295
Mixed 344
SusWrite 132
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 39.2
157% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 215
185% 270 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 89%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
77GB free
Firmware: 605ABBF2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 101 108 100 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 261
Write 137
Mixed 207
SusWrite 107
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 46.9
171% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 124
95% 127 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 73%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
591GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 103 102 105 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 91.3
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 103
58% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST2000LM 007-1R8174 2TB
190GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 33
Write 34
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 37.1
26% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
145GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 55 54 62 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 80.6
Write 118
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 56
63% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
222% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 36.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 20,139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $724
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback