Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	222% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	19.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200702
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	May 13 '21 at 05:54
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 71.4 1-Core 112 2-Core 223 74% 135 Pts	4-Core 411 8-Core 708 68% 560 Pts	64-Core 1,218 75% 1,218 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Asus(1043 046C) CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Lighting 70.7 Reflection 74.1 Parallax 93.4 58% 79.4 fps	MRender 64.6 Gravity 66.1 Splatting 45.4 47% 58.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 980 1TB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 274% 515GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1205 1055 1143 1389 1378 1143 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	222% Outstanding	Read 1,842 Write 2,045 Mixed 1,158 SusWrite 1,219 352% 1,566 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 93 4K Mixed 46.2 155% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 582 DQ Write 588 DQ Mixed 602 448% 591 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 222% Great: 396%
Amd-raid Array 3 499GB 95 User benchmarks, average bench 146% 181GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 794 450 381 380 355 342 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 843 Write 993 Mixed 670 SusWrite 450 166% 739 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 93.2 4K Mixed 37.2 134% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 648 DQ Mixed 294 268% 394 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 288%
Amd-raid SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 69GB free Firmware: 1AA0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 46 47 52 50 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30% Below average	Read 56.3 Write 65.7 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 47.7 40% 54.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 62%
Amd-raid SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 579GB free Firmware: 1AG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 55 56 58 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 77.6 Write 84 Mixed 41.8 SusWrite 55.9 48% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.5% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 24.8 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 27.5 SC Mixed 23.3 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,064

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)