Today's hottest deals

Exper DIAMOND

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemExper DIAMOND  (all builds)
MotherboardECS H61H2-MV
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '21 at 16:55
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 145
59% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 207
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 2.8
6% 8 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 3.9
5% 5.87 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 59 49 62 60 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 65.6
Write 65.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 58.6
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 51%
Generic- Compact Flash 4GB
4GB free, PID 6361
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.7 4.3 4.8 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 4
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.6
6% 5.05 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 0B29 KAi-D3ZU1333M 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DIAMOND Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Exper DIAMOND

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback