Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire X3400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 years ago, 10 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire X3400  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer WMCP78M
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110216
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateAug 18 '14 at 01:52
Run Duration1103 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 255
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 65.5
29% 59 Pts
4-Core 68.7
8-Core 77.2
10% 72.9 Pts
64-Core 83.4
5% 83.4 Pts
Poor: 30% Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
PNY(196E 0828) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 3.34
3% 4.11 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 4.43
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 3.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 67%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 3.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Microsoft Virtual Disk 3.5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 76.4
Write 47.4
Mixed 62.6
47% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.19
4K Mixed 0.13
51% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
225GB free
Firmware: 3.AFM Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 42%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
12GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.93% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.68
11% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.43
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
17% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.93%
Great: 9%
Multiple Flash Reader 8GB
5GB free, PID 6361
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 6.3
Mixed 8.77
12% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.41
4K Write 0.23
4K Mixed 0.2
27% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 10%
Generic- Multi-Card 2GB
2GB free, PID 0118
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.53% Terrible
Read 10.1
Write 6.41
Mixed 7.87
10% 8.14 MB/s
4K Read 2.67
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.02
11% 0.9 MB/s
Generic- Compact Flash 4GB
1GB free, PID 6361
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 16.4
Mixed 14.8
22% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.69
4K Write 2.37
4K Mixed 0.96
127% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1GB
0GB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Read 13.6
Write 4.32
Mixed 6.38
9% 8.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.38
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
14% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 5%
Typical Aspire X3400 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback