Today's hottest deals

Exper DIAMOND

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemExper DIAMOND  (all builds)
MotherboardECS H61H2-MV
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 02 '21 at 14:15
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 54
2-Core 82.2
45% 69 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 121
17% 123 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Sapphire(174B E101) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 8.2
Parallax 3.7
4% 5.7 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.2
5% 5.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 6.1 7.1 9.6 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 36.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 9
17% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 51%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
375GB free
Firmware: 060E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 14 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 16.9
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 15.9
16% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 66%
Generic- Compact Flash 4GB
0GB free, PID 6361
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.9 4.4 4.8 4.6 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.6
6% 5.07 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 15%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
10GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 3.1 8.9 5 8.4 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 27.2
Write 15.7
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 7.1
20% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.1
133% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 0B29 KAi-D3ZU1333M 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 9.1
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.8
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DIAMOND Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Exper DIAMOND

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback