Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z370-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-P  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '21 at 18:01
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 593
71% 546 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.8% Excellent
Lighting 99.5
Reflection 113
Parallax 102
81% 105 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 97.6
Splatting 99.1
80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7,196
Write 6,684
Mixed 6,750
1,536% 6,877 MB/s
4K Read 467
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 212
1,061% 278 MB/s
DQ Read 1,285
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 497
448% 708 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate ST3000LM024-2AN17R 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 131 130 130 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 78.8
Write 111
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 128
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
192% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 38
Write 40.9
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 22.5
25% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
259% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18%
Great: 94%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
830GB free
Firmware: 1402
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 141 143 143 146 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
912GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 110 110 110 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 100
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 110
71% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
200% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 94%
Intenso External_USB_3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 183 184 184 183 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 196
Write 133
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 182
195% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 65%
Seagate Desktop 3TB
243GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 36
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 20.3
38% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
27% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C16K4D CMK16GX4M2L3000C15 CM4X8GD3000C16K4D CMK16GX4M2L3000C15 32GB
2733, 2733, 2733, 2733 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 27.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 25.4
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-P Builds (Compare 10,949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-P - $429

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $822
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback