Asrock X370M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X370M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 22:34
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 75.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 233
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 831
78% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,249
77% 1,249 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Gigabyte(1458 3FBF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3550 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 104
Parallax 95.5
89% 103 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 96
Splatting 80.6
78% 97.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Orico V500 512GB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 260 224 222 227 227 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,656
Write 1535
Mixed 1,006
SusWrite 232
246% 1,107 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 28.2
111% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 431
DQ Write 27.4
DQ Mixed 50.4
82% 170 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 124%
Great: 241%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC96
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 111 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 100
Write 104
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 113
64% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 74%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
704GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 94 95 96 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 96
Write 96.9
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 94.8
126% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 31.5
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 27.4
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 2R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 6% 141 298 240 70 32" 2560 1440 HWP3337 HP Pavilion32
Typical X370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $659
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback