Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '21 at 20:05
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 1,114
96% 822 Pts
64-Core 1,939
120% 1,939 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57% Above average
Lighting 70.2
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 65.4
57% 68.8 fps
MRender 74.3
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 64.2
56% 69.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv CRAS C700 RGB M.2 NVMe SSD 240GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0801L4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,195
Write 987
Mixed 902
229% 1,028 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 75.3
279% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 531
DQ Write 1,020
DQ Mixed 257
342% 603 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 193%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
480GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 158 155 156 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 155
Mixed 105
SusWrite 157
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 109%
DISK 32GB
25GB free, PID ef18
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 8.5 8.7 8.9 8.5 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Read 9.2
Write 8.2
Mixed 3.2
SusWrite 8.2
9% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 46.1
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 35.9
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 34.6
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 21: 2R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 22% 40 110 5 60 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
History: Score 38: 3R 5G 8B | Score 21: 2R 2G 5B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $973
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback