CDM DQ67SW-R01

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	CDM DQ67SW-R01 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ67SW
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120210
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '21 at 13:01
Run Duration	223 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 89.2 2-Core 173 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 336 45% 337 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 E205) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 2 2% 2.37 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 2 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 143 145 133 146 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 461 Write 447 Mixed 304 SusWrite 166 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 36.3 121% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 177 184% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 108%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 175GB free Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 450 295 242 246 246 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 424 Write 436 Mixed 368 SusWrite 320 87% 387 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 29.3 94% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 324 246% 332 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905474-012.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.8% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 15.3 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 18: 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
18%	8%	74	20	15	60	24"	1920 1080	SAM068B SMBX2440

History: Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 18: 2R 2G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DQ67SW-R01 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: CDM DQ67SW-R01

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	24x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	20x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	13x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	8x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	6x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $45Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	2x
Extreme 240GBSanDisk $200Bench 76%, 7,034 samples	2x

RAM
HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 30%, 1,889 samples	4x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Kingston KVT8FP-HYC CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GBSamsungBench 50%, 3 samples	3x
16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 2x4GBMicronBench 46%, 3,045 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $295

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16