Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$41 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 102 2-Core 178 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 264 36% 266 Pts	64-Core 267 16% 267 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.06% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 7.8 5% 6.23 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.1 5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.06% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$62 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 29 30 50 73 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Read 420 Write 284 Mixed 219 SusWrite 89.2 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 6.5 53% 19 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 74.7 DQ Mixed 40.9 45% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 36GB free Firmware: KC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 96 96 118 131 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Read 129 Write 124 Mixed 60.9 SusWrite 105 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16.5 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 71.7 56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1,755x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	656x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	501x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	349x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	219x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples	178x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $231