Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z170-HD3P
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161104
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 00:37
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 218
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 410
57% 422 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.9% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 54.1
45% 56.5 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 48
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5,106
Mixed 15.6
1,830% 2,561 MB/s
4K Read 656
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
27,512% 219 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
292GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 105 105 105 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60% Good
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 105
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60%
Great: 58%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
616GB free, PID 2321
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 97.3
Write 70
Mixed 51.4
SusWrite 102
106% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 43%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
6GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 11 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 43.5
Write 14.2
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 12.8
25% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.2
80% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GVR 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 04CD F4-2400C15-8GVR 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 24.2
74% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 21.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 48.9" 1280 720 SAM0E5D C49HG9x
Typical GA-Z170-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 2,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $497
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback