Asrock H81M-HDS

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asrock H81M-HDS (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150723
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '17 at 04:41
Run Duration	362 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$40 19,313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 75.2 1-Core 73.3 2-Core 219 67% 123 Pts	4-Core 373 8-Core 569 58% 471 Pts	64-Core 568 35% 568 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 2763) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Lighting 32 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 37.5 26% 32.9 fps	MRender 40.8 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 33.5 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 26030 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 289 (B1) Unknown 90 90 112 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 49 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 99 (F1) Unknown 99 99 49990380833	75.2% Very good	Read 491 Write 341 Mixed 349 87% 394 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 19.2 84% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 40.2 77% 156 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 296GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 174 2166 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1256 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16095 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 113 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1694 (C2) HDA temperature 104 91 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65.7% Good	Read 109 Write 120 Mixed 124 89% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.25 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.29 120% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 234GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 80 (03) Spinup time 174 169 6300 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4551 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 64 64 26427 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 473 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 160 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 37 37 489217 (C2) HDA temperature 112 98 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 5 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 5 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 3	48.1% Average	Read 91.4 Write 76.1 Mixed 74 60% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.16 73% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 59%
160 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 11GB free, PID 5561 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	5.8% Terrible	Read 13.7 Write 5.01 Mixed 2.46 7% 7.06 MB/s	4K Read 4.09 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 1.27 78% 1.98 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.8% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX 9905403-478.A00LF 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 16.9 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.8 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 89.8 44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	173x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	161x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	100x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	133x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	74x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	57x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	89x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	23x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16