Asrock H81M-HDS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150723
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 23 '17 at 05:03
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$209
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 205
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 539
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 539
33% 539 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2763) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 37.4
26% 33 fps
MRender 40.8
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 34
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 491
Write 343
Mixed 350
87% 394 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 19.2
85% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 49.5
84% 165 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
299GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 146
Write 144
Mixed 127
104% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.33
116% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
224GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
43% Average
Read 77.1
Write 73
Mixed 72.9
56% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.24
61% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43%
Great: 59%
11GB free, PID 5561
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
6.9% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 3.62
Mixed 8.37
10% 8.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 1.05
86% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.9%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C9D3/4GX 9905403-478.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 18.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 60.1
66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback